There exist multiple indications of the fact that book reviews create obstreperous discussions and debates among academics. Generally, academics claim that reviews represent a mere subjective impression about a book and therefore, cannot be estimated as academically valuable. Moreover, some reaction paper topics have mentioned that reviews do not propose much print space for developing a constructive argument. Also, some authors have been focusing readers’ attention towards the lack of references in book reviews, claiming this as a sign of poor scholastic quality. Finally, it has been also suggested that book reviews cannot be regarded as scholarship as long as they are not included in the list of works cited. However, book reviews were supported by many enthusiasts who pointed out that reviews assist scholars in keeping abreast of current scientific knowledge. Also, many reviews represent specimens of good English for writing research papers and could be used for scholastic communication between colleagues within the discipline. In addition, the reviewer’s visibility often plays a crucial role for a reviewer’s academic promotion.