Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Since its inception in 1998, the Football Bowl Subdivision, or FBS has utilized the Bowl Championship Series, or BCS to ascertain its champion, and subsequently eliminate the quandary of getting dual champions. This system however has become the topic of significant controversy. The debate is over if the FBS must scrap their current format in favour of a playoff. Considering they are one of several leagues, college or pro, that doesn't have an end-of-year championship to ascertain their winner. The FBS needs a playoff as it would enable all one hundred twenty five teams on college football's highest level a realistic opportunity to compete for a championship. The Football Bowl Subdivision claims that all groups have an equal opportunity to play for a title, but this isn't accurate in their existing setup. The FBS separates teams into two groups, both the automatic qualifiers, or even AQ colleges ; another group is the non-qualifiers, or non-AQ schools. Automatic qualifying conferences have contractual agreements with the BCS guaranteeing seminar winners a place in a BCS game. A good instance of this is that the Rose Bowl, that matches the Big-Ten champion against the Pac-12 champion. In case the champion of either conference is in the top two at the BCS ranks, their spot belongs to the group that finished second in the conference. Teams which do not win their conference, but finish in the top fourteen in the rankings are qualified for an at-large bidding in a BCS game. Non-automatic qualifying teams don't have any contractual arrangements and unlike Automatic qualifying colleges, have to finish in the top five in the positions to qualify for a BCS game. Herein lies the very first major problem with the BCS -- passing within a undefeated mid-major team in favor of a m.. .